Development of cat breeds has followed four major strategies:
1) The most common strategy has been the manipulation of a subset of cats from a natural population (e.g., Norwegian Forest Cat, Persians)
2) The selection of a novel mutation that produces a unique trait that arose in a single cat, generally also from a random bred population, while using selective mating to fix these traits to define the breed (e.g., Selkirk Rex)
3) Mixing lineages to create cross-breed hybrids (e.g., Ocicat)
4) Developing breeds that are interspecies crosses (e.g., Bengal).
In population analysis, there is a clear separation between eastern and western populations, while the Abyssinian and Ocicat breeds appear equidistant between both populations. LD was found to be shortest in the Siberian and most extended in Burmese. In evaluating what the results mean to GWA studies, eastern breeds are likely to generate successful studies, especially the domestic Burmese, where GWAS are more likely to achieve results even with few cases and controls. Western breeds such as Turkish Angora, Cornish Rex, Japanese Bobtail, Manx, Russian Blue, Siberian, and random bred cats may require larger number of cases and controls or an array with higher density of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The linkage disequilibrium estimates found with this study can improve the design of GWA studies and the search for candidate genes. [VT]
Funding: this project was partially funded by Winn Feline Foundation grant W09-009.
See also:
Kurushima JD, Lipinski MJ, Gandolfi B, et al. Variation of cats under domestication: genetic assignment of domestic cats to breeds and worldwide random-bred populations. Animal genetics. 2013; 44: 311-24.
Related blogs:
Dec 2007: The ascent of cat breeds: new genetic insights
More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter